REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ELC. NO.1196 OF 2004 RAJNI KANT NATHOO……………............................................................................ PLAINTIFF VERSUS EDWARD NTHULI.…………………………………..................................……1STDEFENDANT PAUL GITHAIGA NG’ANG’A…………………..….......................................…2ND DEFENDANT RAMJI MANJI SHAMJI…………………………....................................…….3RD DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF LANDS…………………......................................……..4TH DEFENDANT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL……………………........................................….5TH DEFENDANT RULING This matter has been handled by various judges but the matter came before me for the first time on 2 nd November 2015 for hearing. It is on this very first time that Counsel for the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, Mr. Gichuki Kingara has requested me to recuse myself from hearing this suit on the grounds that I have declined to hear his Notice of Preliminary Objection filed on 29th October 2015. I do not see any good reason to recuse myself from hearing this suit and so I decline to recuse myself. I will however allow for the hearing of the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed on 29 th October 2015 before the hearing of the main suit. The 2nd and 3rd Defendants are directed to file and serve their written submissions within 14 days from today’s date. The other parties may file and serve their written submissions within 14 days of service. The court shall then give a mention date for confirming compliance and to give a ruling date. DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016. MARY M. GITUMBI JUDGE
Original judgment
Rajni Kant Nathoo & 1 other v Edward Nthuli & 4 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.