Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

(deceased) Redemta Mutei Ngutu v Muthye Ngutu Kiteme

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 5 OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF SIMON NGUTU ALIAS SIMON NGUTU KITEME (DECEASED) REDEMTA MUTEI NGUTU.................................................APPLICANT VERSUS MUTHYE NGUTU KITEME.............................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. Joseph Nzomo Ngutu, (deceased) died domiciled in Kenya on the 17th June, 1989. Letters of Administration intestate (grant) in respect of his Estate were granted to Muthye Ngutu Kiteme. 2. On the 8th October, 2015, Redempta Mutei Ngutu, the Applicant, approached this court by way of summons for revocation of grant seeking orders that: (i) She is the wife of Joseph Nzomo Ngutu now deceased, the first son of the deceased whose Estate is a beneficiary; (ii) The Certificate of Confirmation of grant issued to Muthye Ngutu Kiteme at Mwingi Principal Magistrate’s Court on 28th November, 2012 be revoked. 3. The application is premised on grounds that: The proceedings to obtain the grant were defective in substance; The grant was obtained fraudulently by the making of false statements and concealment from court of material facts; The grant was obtained by means of untrue allegations of facts essential in point to justify the grant notwithstanding that the allegation was made in ignorance or inadvertently and the property of the deceased’s Estate has not been properly distributed. 4. Also included in the body of the application is that: The Succession Cause was clandestinely filed by the Petitioner who excluded the Applicant, a wife of Joseph Nzomo. 5. The application is unopposed. 6. The Certificate of Confirmation of grant issued to the Respondent herein indicates shares of heirs to the Estate of the deceased as: Alice Mutongoi Ngutu Virginia Mwikali Ngutu Penina Mutindi Ngutu Winfred Nzambi Ngutu Properties forming the Estate of the deceased were identified as: Plot No. Mwingi/Mbondoni/915 and Plot No. Miguani/Mbondoni/921 were to be registered in the name of the Respondent who was to hold them for herself and in trust for other beneficiaries aforestated.

page 1 of 2

7. The letter written by the Assistant Chief, Kavuoni Sub-location has the name of Joseph Nzomo Ngutu included as the son of the deceased. The Applicant herein adduced evidence of a certificate of marriage solemnized between Joseph N. Ngutu and the Applicant herein. It is indicated that at the time of solemnizing their marriage in 1999, they were already married under the customary law. 8. This perse is evidence that she was entitled to benefit from the Estate of Joseph N. Ngutu. This fact was not disclosed at the point of confirmation of grant. 9. A grant may be revoked if it established that it was obtained following concealment of something material from the court. (See Section 76(b) of the Law of Succession Act). 10.In the matter of the Estate of Thereki Wangunyu also known as Thareka Wangunyo HCSUCC No. 1996 of 1999 where a widow obtained a grant of representation without disclosing one of her stepchildren and some of her own children as beneficiaries, the court held that she merited the revocation of the grant but ordered that instead it would order that the stepchildren left out be included in the list of beneficiaries without interfering with the grant. 11.The grant herein was made to the Respondent in her capacity as the widow of the deceased. Guided by Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act, this court would still prefer the Respondent being the surviving spouse as the administratix of the Estate. In the premises the grant issued will remain intact. However, the order confirming the grant be and is hereby revoked. In the result I proceed to make orders as follows: i. The Applicant shall have 21 days within which to file an affidavit of protest in accordance with Rule 40(6) of the Probate and Administration Rules. ii. Consequently, a date of hearing of the arising dispute shall be fixed at the registry (Mwingi Law Court). iii. Costs of the application shall be borne by the Respondent. 12.It is so ordered. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 19th day of January, 2016. L. N. MUTENDE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.