Maina & Maina Advocates v Umar M. Hamidi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL & ADMIRALTY DIVISION MISC CASE NO. 98 OF 2015 MAINA & MAINA ADVOCATES………….…………PLAINTIFF VERSUS UMAR M. HAMIDI…………………………………..DEFENDANT RULING 1. The Notice of Motion application before the court is dated 19th October 2015 and is filed by the Plaintiff seeking that judgement be entered against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs.2,150,053.11 only being advocate/clients costs as taxed on 27 th July 2015 together with interests therein at the rate of 14% p.a from 27th July 2015 until payment in full. The application also seeks costs of this application. 2. The application is premised on the grounds set out therein and its supported by the affidavit of MAUREEN MAITAL sworn on 19th October 2015. The applicants case is that; 1. The Applicant’s bill of costs was taxed in the sum of Kenya Shillings Two Million, One Hundred and Fifty Thousand, Fifty three and Eleven Cents (2,150,053.11) and a certificate of taxation issued to that effect. 2. The said Certificate of taxation has not been set aside and/or altered whereas the retainer is not disputed. 3. Since the assessment the Respondent has neglected and/or refused to settle the taxed sum together with interest thereon. 4. It is in the interest of justice that advocates are remunerated for their services. 3. The application is not opposed. It was served upon the respondent through a Registered Post vide DHL offices on 8th January 2016. An affidavit of service was filed in court on 25 th January 2016 sworn by Haggai Ochieng Akello, the process server. I have no reason to doubt the service. 4. Having considered the application and the evidence of certificate of taxation attaché to the application, I am satisfied that the application is merited. 5. In the upshot the application is allowed as prayed. READ, DELIVERED AND DATED, AT NAIROBI THIS 5th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016.

page 1 of 2