REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO 87 OF 2003(OS) KIRIGIA KIARUNYI...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1. DORIS CIOMBAKA IMATHIU 2. KABURU JAPHET IMATHIU 3. MWITI JAPHET IMATHIU.....................DEFENDANTS RULING Notice to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution had been properly issued and the Hon. Justice S. Githinji on 09/07/2015 referred the matter to the DR to be mentioned on 09/09/2015. This matter has now been referred to this Court. Mr. Mutuma for the Plaintiff has explained to this Court that the Plaintiff has closed his case. He says that there is no delay on his part. He has asked the Court to deem this as enough explanation to the satisfaction of the Court that this suit should not be dismissed. Mrs. Ntarangwi has told the Court that the Defendant is ready to be heard. I find that the parties have satisfied this Court that this suit should not be dismissed. The parties are ordered to have the case listed for hearing at the Registry within 60 days of today. It is so ordered. Delivered in open Court at Meru this 29th day of February, 2016 in the presence of:CC: Lilian/Daniel Mutuma for the Plaintiff Mrs. Ntaragwi for the Defendant P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Kirigia Kiarunyi v 1. Doris Ciombaka Imathiu 2. Kaburu Japhet Imathiu 3. Mwiti Japhet Imathiu
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.