REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 184 OF 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF OMUSUGU OBARA ANYANGA........(DECEASED) AND PETER PANYAKO OMUSUGU.................PETITIONER RULING 1. This Court is asked to consider and determine the Chamber Summons dated 4 th June 2010 for the following prayers:a. Grant of letters of Administration intestate issued on 5.10.2009 to Peter Panyako Omusugu be revoked and /or annulled. b. All subsequent orders arising from and incidental to the said grant be nullified. c. Costs be provided for. 2. The evidence before Court is that each of the Applicants have brought this application on behalf of the Estate of their Deceased parents, Patrick Emoit Barasa bring the Application on behalf of the Estate of Francis Barasa Omusugu (Deceased), Bisansio Etyang Ojuma on behalf of the Estate of Saferio Ojuma Omusugu (Deceased) and Christopher Omuse Odere on behalf of the Estate of Thomas Papa Omusugu(Deceased). But in doing so, they have not demonstrated to this Court that they are the Personal Representatives of those respective Estates. Even if they turn out to be the persons entitled to be the Administrators of those Estates, they do not for now have legal capacity to bring this application on behalf of the Estate. (see a string of Decisions including Trouistik Union International & Another Vs Mbeyu & Another [1993] KLR 230, Christine Achieng Ogesa & another vs British American Asset Managers Limited [2012] eKLR). The application is a non-starter and for striking out. 3. The Chamber Summons of 4th June 2010 hereby struck out with no order as to costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Busia this 24th February 2016. F. TUIYOTT JUDGE In the Presence of Orwasa - C/Assistant …………………….. for Petitioner ………………………for Objectors
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.