Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Faith Gesare Rasugu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL MURDER NO. 01 OF 2016 REPUBLIC……………………………………………………...........................PROSECUTOR VERSUS FAITH GESARE RASUGU……………………………………….........................…ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused person herein FAITH GESARE RASUGU is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars of the charge are that on 4th January, 2016 at Teresi village in Kisii Central District within Kisii County in the Republic of Kenya murdered BRADFORD MATUNDURA. 3. On the 19th January 2016, the accused pleaded not guilty to the charge and is currently awaiting her trial. 4. The accused has through her advocate Mr. Nyagwencha has now applied to be released on bond pending her trial in line with the provisions of Article 49 (l) (h) of the constitution. 5. Mr. Otieno who appeared for the state did not oppose the application for the release of the accused person on bond. 6. In view of the above, I hereby allow the accused’s application on bond on the following terms:a. The accused shall be released on bond upon executing her own personal bond of Kshs. 500,000/= with 2 sureties of a similar amount. b. Once she is released on bond, she shall appear in court whenever she is required to do so by the Honourable Court until the case is heard and determined or until further orders of this Honourable Court. c. In default of (2) above, the bond shall be cancelled immediately and the sureties taken to account. Delivered, dated and signed in at Kisii on 30th day of March, 2016. W.A. OKWANY JUDGE In the presence of:

page 1 of 2

Mochama for the State Nyagwencha for the Accused Omwoyo court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.