Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamud Iltarakwa Kochale & 5 others v Lake Turkana Wind Power Ltd & 4 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO. 163 OF 2014 MOHAMUD ILTARAKWA KOCHALE....................1ST PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT KOCHALE SOMO CHALE.....................................2ND PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT ISSA JITEWE GAMBARE.....................................3RD PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT DAVID TAMASOT ARAKHOLE.............................4TH PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT WILLIAM LENGOYIAP...........................................5TH PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT SEKOTEY SEYE........................................................6TH PLAITIFF/APPLICANT (Suing on behalf of the residents of Laisamis Constituency and Karare Ward of Marsabit County) VERSUS LAKE TURKANA WIND POWER LTD..............1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT MARSABIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT..............2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL...............................3RD DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR..................................4TH DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT THE NATIONAL LAND COMMISSION.............5TH DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT AARON ILTELE LESIANTAM...........................................1ST INTERSTED PARTY HENRY PARASIAN SAKALPO......................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY STEPHEN NAKENO........................................................3RD INTERESTED PARTY JOB LMALASIAN LENGOYA........................................4TH INTERESTED PARTY DAIR LENTIPAN.............................................................5TH INTERESTED PARTY (As representatives of the residents of Loiyangalani District, Marsabit County RULING CONTAINING DIRECTIONS ON HOW THE NOTICE OF MOTION APPLICATION DATED 14.10.2014 IS TO BE HEARD.

page 1 of 2

The parties appeared before me on 09/03/2016. These are the directions of the Court:1. 2nd Respondent reluctantly allowed to sort out its house and highlight its Submissions on 23/05/2016 on which date a date for a Ruling in this matter will be pronounced. 2. All Parties allowed to put in a 2 pages Conspectus/Submissions on the DR's report and file and serve the same 10 days before the next mention date. 3. In terms of Section 63, CPA, Interim orders are extended. 4. Highlighting of Submissions by the 2nd Defendant and further Directions on 23/05/2016. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 9th day of March, 2016 in the presence of:- CC: Daniel/Lilian Sagana/Miss Hashi for Plaintiff Applicant Wairoto for 1st Respondent Wairoto h/b Kiprop for Interested Parties Miss Kungu for 3rd,4th and 5th Respondents P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.