Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 5682 of 2016

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI HCCR REVISION. NO. 14 OF 2016 JULIUS OIRE ORWARO……….............…………… APPELLANT -VERSUSREPUBLIC …………….……………………………….. RESPONDENT RULING 1. JULIUS OIRE ORWARO was convicted on his own plea of guilty to the offence of illegally cutting and removing forest produce Contrary to Section 52(1) of the Forest Act Cap 385. He was sentenced before Nanyuki Chief Magistrate’s court to 6 months imprisonment. He has served 4 months of that sentence. 2. This court in exercise of its revision power under Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75 has requested the probation office to prepare, which it has, on the suitability of the release of the applicant. 3. The applicant stated, according to that report, that he went to collect firewood from the forest at the request of his employer. He did not know that it was against the law. He is remorseful. He desires to return to his home in Nyamira County. 4. Having considered the probation report and the submissions of the state I do find this to be a fit and proper case to exercise the power of revision. 5. The order of this court is that the applicant JULIUS OIRE ORWARO shall serve the remainder of this sentence doing Community Service at Ekerenyo Health Centre within Itibo Sub-Location Nyamira County. To that end the applicant shall be released from custody unless he is otherwise lawfully held. Dated and Delivered at Nanyuki this 20th April, 2016 MARY KASANGO JUDGE Coram Before Justice Mary Kasango

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant – Njue For Applicant ……………………………………. For state …………………………………. COURT Ruling delivered in open court MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.