Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Henry Mutembei v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI HCCR REVISION NO.20 OF 2016 HENRY MUTEMBEI…………….....................................………APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………..........…………..RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant, HENRY MUTEMBEI, was convicted on his own plea of guilty to the offence of possession of narcotic drug Contrary to Section 3 (2) (a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Control Act. He was sentenced before the Nanyuki Chief Magistrate’s court to serve 18 months prison sentence. He has so far served 7 months of that sentence. 2. This matter is before me with a request to exercise this court’s power of revision as provided under Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75. 3. To assist this court consider revision a probation report on the applicant was availed. It reveals that the applicant who is 53 years old is a first offender. He is the sole bread winner of his children after his wife deserted the matrimonial home. He is remorseful and requests for the remainder of sentence to be noncustodial. 4. Having considered the probation report and the submissions of the prosecution counsel I find that this is a proper case to revise the applicant’s sentence. 5. Accordingly I order HENRY MUTEMBEI to serve the remaining sentence doing Community Service at IMENTI Primary School. To that end the applicant shall be released from custody unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated and Delivered at Nanyuki this 20th April, 2016 MARY KASANGO JUDGE Coram

page 1 of 2

Before Justice Mary Kasango Court Assistant – Njue For Applicant …………………………..... For state …………………………………. COURT Ruling delivered in open court MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.