IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 280 OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GACHEKI MUCHAIRU ( DECEASED) LOYFORD MUTURI KARIBA..................................1ST ADMINISTRATOR CHARLES RENJI MUCHIRA................................2ND ADMINISTRATOR RULING Failure to provide for a widow [1] Before me is an application dated 27 th August, 2015 for confirmation of grant issued on 2 nd June 2015 before expiry of six months as required in law. But I wish to quickly state that now over six months have passed by and I will treat this application as an ordinary application for confirmation of grant. There seems to be no objection to confirmation of grant as the mode of distribution proposed by the administrators. For clarity, the earlier objection raised herein was determined and resulted into annulment of the earlier grant and a fresh grant of representation was made to the administrators herein. I note also that all the children of the deceased have also been listed in paragraph2 of the said affidavit. Again, this estate involves two houses; that of Muthoni Gacoki (1st wife) and Teresia Gaiti Gachoki (2nd wife)- a fact that is disclosed in paragraph 3 of the Affidavit in support of the application for confirmation. There is therefore no major hurdle which may prevent confirmation of the grant. However, one matter is troubling my mind. Whereas there is provision for the 1 st wife, there is none for the 2 ndwife. I consider that matter to be important yet no explanationwas given about it.I am inclined, therefore, to seek for that information before I can confirm the grant. I make this decision fully aware that no formal protest has beenfiled by the 1st wife but the omission, if at all is glaring and being a matter of law the court should be satisfied about. Accordingly, I direct the administrator to provide the said informationor clarification to court forthwith after which I willrender my decision on confirmation application dated 27 th August, 2015. It is so ordered. Dated, Delivered and Signed in open court at Meru this 16th day of June, 2016 F. GIKONYO JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Kirimi advocate for the applicant B.G. for respondent absent. F. GIKONYO JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.