REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYAAT NAIROBI MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2016 ERIC OTIENO ATANGA….……………………………………APPLICANT Versus REPUBLIC ……………………………….………………..…RESPONDENT RULING I have considered the application. Nothing stops this court from consolidating the bail terms. Indeed, a look at bail terms in Criminal Case No. 1099/2015 are not commensurate with the offence. The bail is too high. In Criminal Case No. 670/15, the court did not justify why an alternative cash bail was not given. It must be borne in mind that bail/bond is given with the prime reason to ensure that the accused attends court when called upon to do so. He remains innocent until or unless otherwise proven. The terms of the bail/bond should also not be so high that they negate the very purpose for which they are granted. Having made the above observation, I note that the two files are being investigated by one Police Unit, Banking Fraud Investigations Unit. Hence, no prejudice will be occasioned to the prosecution if the bail terms are consolidated. Accordingly, I consolidate the bail/bond terms in both Nairobi Criminal Case Nos. 670 of 2015 and 1099 of 2015. The Applicant is released on a cash bail of Kshs. 200,000/= or a bond of Kshs. 500,000/= with one surety of a similar amount. The surety shall be assessed by the magistrate. Criminal Case No. 670 of 2015 and surety approval forms be filed in each of the files for ease of reference. DATED and DELIVERED in open court this 30th day of May, 2016. G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA JUDGE In the presence of: 1. Applicant in person 2. M/s Aluda for the Respondent
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.