Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nyaga Kaugi Muiga v Eustace Nyaga Kanampiu & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO 1 OF 2006 NYAGA KAUGI MUIGA …..............................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS EUSTACE NYAGA KANAMPIU.........................................1ST DEFENDANT EMPRAHIM GITONGA MWIANDI.....................................2ND DEFENDANT DIRECTOR OF LAND ADJUDICATION............................3RD DEFENDANT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL …........................................4TH DEFENDANT RULING This application is dated 24/12/2014 and seeks orders:a. THAT, this application be certified urgent and that the same be heard expeditiously. b. THAT, this honourable Court be pleased to substitute the deceased plaintiff herein NYAGA KAUGI MUIGA with the applicant herein LINUS MIRITI JUSTUS. c. Costs of this application be in cause. WHICH APPLICATION is grounded on the reasons that:a. The Plaintiff died on 30th May, 2014. b. The applicant one LINUS MIRITI JUSTUS is the legal representative of the deceased. During directions on 10/05/2016 , it transpired that the application is not opposed. It is therefore , allowed with Costs to be in the cause. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:CC: Lilian /Daniel Ojiambo h/b Ondari for the Plaintiff

page 1 of 2

Ashava h/b Mburugu for 1st and 2nd Defendants Kieti for 3rd and 4th Defendants P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Nyaga Kaugi Muiga v Eustace Nyaga Kanampiu & 3 others — Original judgment | Caselaw