REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A CRIMINAL CASE NO 3 OF 2013 (FORMERLY NAIROBI HC CR CASE NO 50 OF 2013) REPUBLIC……………………………..……………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS ALEXANDER MBURU WANJIKU..……………………. ACCUSED RULING 1. The Accused in this case is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 19/04/2013 that on 28/03/2013 in Thika Township within Kiambu County he murdered one Julius Kang’ethe Mburu. On 26th June 2013 the Áccused pleaded not guilty to the charge. By a ruling dated and delivered on 22/11/2013 he was admitted to bail pending his trial. For various reasons appearing on the court record the Accused’s trial has never commenced. 2. On 02/03/2016 the prosecution informed the court that they intended to seek the court’s permission to terminate these proceedings against the Accused by entering a nolle prosequi. They sought time to first discuss the matter with the victim’s family. On 14/06/2016 Mr. Njeru, learned prosecution counsel, informed the court that he had reviewed the circumstances of this case as set out in the case summary contained in the bundle of documents availed to the Accused and to the court, and also the available evidence. In his considered view it would not be a profitable use of the court’s time, and effort by the prosecution, to proceed with the case. He therefore sought to terminate the proceedings by entry of a nolle prosequi. Learned counsel for the Accused, Mr. Kirubi, had no objection. 3. I have perused the bundle of documents mentioned by Mr. Njeru, which include witness statements. Having done so, I will allow the prosecution to terminate these proceedings by nolle prosequi. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 2016 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT MURANGA THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY 2016
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.