Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jesica Muthoni v Wilson Nyaga Mutaku Samuel Njeru Nancy Mutitu Mary Marigu & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 878 OF 2002 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MATAKU MURUAMIU alias MUTUKU MURIAMIU JESICA MUTHONI.................................................APPLICANT/PETITONER VERSUS WILSON NYAGA MUTAKU SAMUEL NJERU NANCY MUTITU MARY MARIGU.................................................................RESPONDENTS JANE WANJA BEATRICE MURUGI RULING 1. This application which was brought by summons proceeded in the absence of the respondents/objectors after I was satisfied that they were properly served and had adequate notice. 2. In support of her application to remove the restriction placed against land parcel No. Kyeni/Kigumo/367 on 1st February 2011 by the objectors, the applicant has relied on the following grounds. Firstly, she states that the matter was concluded way back on 12th April 2016 and that there is nothing pending in court. Secondly, the objectors placed the restriction against the suit land during the pendency of this suit. And finally she states that the confirmed grant needs to be implemented so that the rightful beneficiaries can be given their shares to the estate. 3. The applicant's application is grounded on her supporting affidavit. In that affidavit, she has deponed that there is no application pending in this matter, since the ruling dismissed the respondents' application for revocation of grant on 12th April 2016. She also deponed that the respondents through their advocate placed a restriction in respect of the suit land which restriction is still in force. She has further deponed that this restriction should be removed to enable her to fully implement the grant. 4. I have considered the application and I find that it is unopposed. I find that the confirmed grant has not been challenged. I also find that the placing of the restriction in respect of the suit land is not justified. 5. In the circumstances, I hereby set aside the restriction. I hereby grant the applicant's application in

page 1 of 2

terms of prayer No. 1 of the ex parte summons. 6. There will be no orders as to costs. RULING DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this 5th day of JULY 2016 In the presence of Ms Muthoni holding brierf for Mr. E K. Njagiand in the absence of the respondents Court clerk Njue J.M. BWONWONGA JUDGE 05.07.16

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.