REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 19 OF 2013 REPUBLIC..................................APPLICANT VERSUS FARAH MUSE ESKEL..................................................ACCUSED RULING Having considered the evidence on record, and bearing in mind that at this stage the prosecution is merely required to establish a prima facie case against the accused, I find that the accused has a case to answer. I thus put the accused on his defence. I consequently proceed to explain to the accused the three options available to him in his defence under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 75). Dated and delivered at Garissa this 30th day of August 2016 GEORGE DULU JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.