REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI ELC CIVIL CASE NO.207 Of 2014 1. HENRY MWAKAMUSHA MOKOWA..............................................................PLAINTIFF =VERSUS= 1. BAKARI MWEMA MWARO 2. LAND REGISTRAR KILIFI..........................................................................DEFENDANTS RULING 1. In the Plaint dated 5th November, 2014, the Plaintiff is seeking for a declaration that the Estate of Mukoa Kalodzi Ngowa is the lawful owner of parcel of land number Kaloleni/Vishakani/529 ( the suit property). 2. In his Preliminary Objection of 12 th August, 2015, the 2nd Defendant has averred that the deceased has never been the registered owner of the suit property; that the Plaintiff has not disclosed the steps undertaken to obtain the full grant and that the suit is therefore an abuse of the court process. 3. This Ruling is in respect to the said Preliminary Objection. 4. Although it is the Attorney General on behalf of the 2 nd Defendant who filed the Preliminary Objection, it is the 1st Defendant's counsel who filed submissions in support of the same. 5. The 1st Defendant's counsel submitted that although the Plaintiff alleges to be the administrator of the Estate of Joseph Mukowa Kalodzi, the attached limited letters of administration ad litem is in respect to the estate of Mukoa Kalodzi Ngowa; that the Plaintiff has no locus standi to bring this suit on behalf of the late Joseph Mokowa Kalodzi and that the claim by the Plaintiff that the late Joseph Mokowa Kolonzi and Mukoa Kalodzi Ngowa refers to one and the same person is not true. 6. The Plaintiff's advocate submitted that the 2 nd Defendant has not raised any pure points of law as contemplated by the case of Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Company Limited Vs West End Distributors Limited (1969) EA696. 7. Counsel submitted that what has been raised are facts which can only be ascertained at the hearing. 8. The Plaintiff's case in this matter is that his late father, Joseph Mukowa Kalonzi, was the registered owner of Kaloleni/Vishakani/529.
page 1 of 2
9. In his Supporting Affidavit sworn on 27 th October, 2014 and the Plaint, the Plaintiff has used the names Mukoa Kalodzi Ngowa and Joseph Mokowa Kalonzi interchangeably. 10. Whether Mokoa Kalodzi Ngowa and Joseph Mokowa Kalonzi are one and the same person as portrayed by the Plaintiff's pleadings can only be ascertained after trial. 11. Although the Defendants have averred that the Plaintiff does not have the locus standi to bring this suit for want of letters of administration, it is the 1 st Defendant who took out citation against the Plaintiff in citation No. 10 of 2012. That is the citation that the Plaintiff is relying on to bring the present proceedings challenging the vesting orders that were issued in the citation case. 12. In any event, the Plaintiff is in possession of limited letters of administration dated 2 nd October, 2014 allowing him to collect and preserve the assets of Mukoa Kalodzi Nogwa. 13. The question as to whether the citation by the 1 st Respondent in Citation Cause No. 10 of 2012 can enable the Plaintiff to pursue the present claim together with the limited letters of administration can only be dealt with conclusively after the court considers the two matters. 14. For the above reasons, I find that the issues that have been raised by the Defendants in the Preliminary Objection dated 12th August, 2015 are not purely points of law as contemplated in the Mukisa Biscuit's case. 15. The Preliminary Objection dated 12th August, 2015 is therefore dismissed with costs. Dated, signed and delivered in Malindi this 14th day of September, 2016. O. A. Angote Judge
page 2 of 2