REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO 81 OF 2006 LAMET LEIYAGU..........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL..........................DEFENDANT RULING 1. Hearing of the main suit was to take place on 19/09/2016. 2. Mr. Kieti for the Respondent told the Court that the matter was being handled by another State Counsel, Mr. Kiongo, who was indisposed . He sought an adjournment. He intimated that the parties may reach an out of Court settlement. 3. Mr. Abuor, for the Plaintiff, asked the Court to indulge Counsel for the Defendant. In view of the intimation by the Counsel for the Defendant that there was a possibility that the parties may reach an out of Court settlement, he asked the Court to order that the parties do visit the scene of the suitland and report back to Court. 4. Mr. Kieti and Mr. Abuor, in company of this Courts' Executive, Officer agreed to visit the disputed land within a month. 5. I issue the following orders:(1) Parties to visit the scene of the disputed land with will prepare and file a report within 30 days of today. this Court's Executive Officer who (2) As agreed, the Plaintiff to facilitate the apposite (3) Directions on 09/11/2016 6. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 19 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:CA: Daniel/James Abuor for the Plaintiff Kieti for the Defendant P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.