Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Paul Onkoba Nyakona

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 19 OF 2016 REPUBLIC………………………..…….……..PROSECUTOR VERSUS PAUL ONKOBA NYAKONA……………......……..ACCUSED RULING 1. PAUL ONKOBA NYAKONA, the accused person herein, faces the charge of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars of the charge are that on 2nd July 2016 at Mogenda village in Gucha South Sub-County within Kisii County murdered DENNIS NYAKWEBA ORENGO. 3. The accused pleaded not guilty to the said charge on 12th July, 2016 and is currently awaiting his trial. 4. Soon after the plea was taken, Mr. Okemwa, learned counsel for the accused, applied for his release on bond pending his trial. Mr. Otieno, counsel for the states did not oppose the said application for bond. 5. In view of the above, and taking into consideration, the fact that the acused’s application for bond was not opposed, I hereby allow the application in line with the Provisions of Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution that guarantees every accused person the right to bond except where there are compelling reasons for not granting the same. 6. I therefore order that the accused be released on his own personal bond of Kshs. 500,000/= with 2 sureties of a similar amount. 7. Upon being released on bond, the accused shall attend court whenever he is required to do so failure of which his bond may be cancelled and the sureties called to account. Delivered, dated and signed in at Kisii on 5th of September, 2016. W.A. OKWANY JUDGE In the presence of: - Mbelete for the State - Kaburi for the Accused - Omwoyo court clerk

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.