Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2837 of 2016

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU PETITION NO. 22 OF 2013 CHARLES KIUNGA M'MBOGORI............................PETITIONER/APPLICANT (Suing as the administrator of the estate of M'KIUNGA M'MBOGORI- Deceased VERSUS MERU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY.....1ST RESPONDENT NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF KENYA......................................2ND REPONDENT LAND ADJUDICATION OFFICER, URINGU ADJUDICATION SECTION..............................................43RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................................4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. This application is filed under Order 8 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, Section 1A,1B,3A & 100 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21, Laws of Kenya and Articles 10, 25(c) , 159 and 162 of the Constitution of Kenya. The application is dated 15/08/2016 and seeks orders:1. THAT the application be certified urgent and it be heard on priority basis. 2. That the Honourable Court be pleased to grant the petitioner/applicant leave to amend his petition in terms of the annexed draft amended petition. 3. THAT costs of this application be in the cause. 2. The application is supported by the Affidavit of CHARLES KIUNGA M'MBOGORI sworn on 15/08/2016. It has the following grounds :i. THAT the only intended amendments are at paragraph 18 of the draft amended petition. ii. THAT the intended amendments are meant to plead the widow of a deceased heir in order to enable the Court make a just and conclusive determination of the matter.

page 1 of 2

iii. THAT there is need for the leave sought in order to plead the surviving heirs. iv. THAT no party will be prejudiced if the application is allowed. 3. When the application was heard interpartes on 07/09/2016, it transpired that it was not opposed . The respondents, however, sought leave to respond to the amended Petition. 4. The application is allowed. 5. Costs shall be in the cause. 6. Respondents are granted leave to respond to the Petition, if necessary. 7. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 14 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:CC: Daniel/Lilian Miss Muna h/b Carlpeters Mbaabu for the Petitioner Murango Mwenda h/b Nyaga for 1st Defendants Kimathi for the Respondent P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.