Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Freedoms Under Article 40 of The Constitution of Kenya Andrew Kaluma & 3 others v The District Land Adjudication & Settlement Igembe South District & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU PETITION NO 9B OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ANDREW KALUMA ….....................................................................1ST PETITIONER NG'OLUA MWANE............................................................................2ND PETITIONER TOM TUARUCIU...............................................................................3RD PETITIONER SAMMY MUTIA...................................................................................4TH PETITIONER VS THE DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT IGEMBE SOUTH DISTRICT.......................................................1ST RESPONDENT THE PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LANDS ....2ND RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL …..........................................................3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. This Ruling relates to a Ruling delivered by this Court on 28/07/2014 concerning two applications dated 7th June, 2012 and 30th July, 2012 respectively. 2. After this Court issued apposite orders on 28th July, 2014, there was an attempt to change the name of the relevant Adjudication Section from Rikiau Adjudication Section to Mula Adjudication Section. 3. Via an order by this Court, the concerned DLASO , Mr. Munyalo, came to Court to explain the status of the situation. 4. The parties entered a consent in the following terms:“By consent, the conservatory orders issued on 28/07/2014 in respect of RIKIAU ADJUDICATION SECTION to extend to that part of the proposed MULA ADJUDICATION SECTION which overlaps into RIKIAU ADJUDICATION SECTION so that there should be no adjudication of land in the said section pending the hearing and determination of this

page 1 of 2

petition”. 5. The Consent is adopted as an order of this Court. 6. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 3 RD DAY OF AUGUST , 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:- CC: Lilian/Daniel Kieti for the Respondents Kariuki for the Petitioners P.M.NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.