Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Jane Njoki

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A CRIMINAL CASE NO 13 OF 2014 REPUBLIC……………….………………….…………………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS JANE NJOKI………………………………………………………….ACCUSED RULING 1The Accused in this case, Jane Njoki, is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 14/05/2014 that between 28 th April and 17th May 2014 at an unknown time at Kamune Village, Kamacharia Sub-location within Murang’a County, she murdered one Francis Mwangi Gachanja. She pleaded not guilty and her trial commenced on 19/10/2015. The case shall be further heard on 12/10/2016. The Accused has in the meantime applied by notice of motion dated 25/04/2016 to be admitted to bail pending conclusion of her trial. The Republic does not oppose the application. 2. Bail pending trial is now a constitutional right that will be denied only for compelling reason; and any condition for such bail must be reasonable. See Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. 3. I have read the witness statements and other documents provided to the Accused and to the court by the prosecution, and have noted the circumstances of the commission of the alleged offence. I find no compelling reason to deny the Accused her constitutional right to bail. 4. In the event. I will allow the notice of motion dated 25/04/2016. The Accused shall be admitted to bail upon her own cognizance in the sum of KShs 500,000/00 pus one surety in like sum. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.