REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL & ADMIRALTY DIVISION HCCC NO. 215 OF 2013 PHILIP KIPKEU KISANG…………..………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS ELIZABETH MUTHONI…….……......….....…..1ST DEFENDANT NICHOLAS KARANI GICHOH……........……..2ND DEFENDANT CHRISTINE WANJIRU KARANI .…......………3RD DEFENDANT ROBERT NJIRU MBOGO T/A NJIRU MBOGO & CO. ADVOCATES.……4TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. When Counsel addressed me on the Notice of Motion of 11 th August, 2014, they urged me to study the Court file in Nairobi Milimani Commercial and Admiralty Division Civil Suit No.436 of 2010 (Elizabeth Muthoni Mbae vs. 1) Nicholas Karani Gichohi (2) Christine Wanjiru Karani (3) Robert Njiru Mbogo t/a Njiru Mbogo & Co. Advocates (hereafter Civil Suit No. 436 of 2010). 2. I am glad that Counsel made that suggestion because upon perusing the Court file in Civil Suit No. 436 of 2010 it has emerged that the said suit was Dismissed with costs by Court on 18 th June, 2015 pursuant to the Provisions of Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In so far as the Motion before Court seeks to have the current suit consolidated with a Dismissed suit for purposes of hearing and determination, it is a non-starter. Counsel for both the Applicant and the Respondent may not have been aware of the said Dismissal Order when they argued the Motion before me on 29th July 2016. 3. The Notice of Motion dated 18th August 2014 was overtaken by the events of 18 th June, 2015 in Civil suit No. 436 of 2010 and is hereby struck out with no order to costs. Dated, Signed and Delivered in Court at Nairobi this 29th day of September ,2016. F. TUIYOTT JUDGE PRESENT; Mulele for Plaintiff N/A for Respondent Alex - Court Clerk
Original judgment
Philip Kipkeu Kisang & 1 other v Elizabeth Muthoni & 3 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.