Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2331 of 2016

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE NO 8 OF 2015 REPUBLIC VERSUS EWM SENTENCE 1. The Court has carefully analysed the circumstances of this case. It is indeed regrettable that a daughter should turn against her own biological mother, an only surviving parent leaving herself and other children orphaned. Indeed, it is also tragic that the basis of the argument was so trivial but ended up leading to the death of the deceased who was actually taking care of the Accused person's daughter at the material time of the incident. The Accused person was drunk and had fought her mother previously. She vented her frustrations on the deceased and now finds herself in the circumstances she finds herself in. In view of her own actions, she must bear the consequences. 2. Having said so, the Court has noted that the accused person is HIV positive, a first offender, a young mother of three (3) young children, remorseful and saved the Court a lot of resources to try this case. Having listened to her mitigation and bearing in mind that the Pre-Sentencing Report dated and filed on 15th June 2016 recommends a custodial sentence which the Accused person does not object to but welcomes the same due to the hostility of her family, community and administration, I hereby sentence the Accused person to serve six (6) years imprisonment for the offence of manslaughter that she voluntarily pleaded guilty to. The period the Accused person has been in custody to be taken into consideration during the computation of her sentence. 3. Right of Appeal within fourteen (14) days from today. Orders accordingly. DATED and DELIVERED at VOI this 15THday of JUNE 2016 J. KAMAU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.