Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2240 of 2016

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 966 OF 2011 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE ABEDNEGO NYAMAI MAKAU – DECEASED AND J M N……………………………………1ST APPLICANT W M N ……………………………………2ND APPLICANT RULING OF THE COURT 1. The Summons before the Court is dated 8th June, 2016 seeking for rectification of the Confirmed Grant issued on 16th November, 2012. Application seeks the following prayers; a. That the grant of letters of administration issued to the said J M N and W M N in this matter on the 25th day of January, 2012, be rectified in the following respects as provided for by Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules: i. The confirmed grant be amended to include the following Barclays bank accounts junior accounts that were opened by the deceased for the minors that were inadvertently left out while making the application for the Confirmation of the Grant. • Account number (particulars withheld) in the name of W M N • Account number (particulars withheld) in the name of M N N • Account Number (particulars withheld) in the name of I W N b. That the said accounts be given to J M N their mother and one of the administrators to operate them and be the signatory. c. That the costs of this application be provided for. 2. I have considered the application. It is not opposed. It is also merited as per the Supporting Affidavit. 3. The application is allowed, and rectification ordered as prayed. Dated and delivered at Machakos this 26th day of October, 2016. ……………………………… E. OGOLA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE In the presence of; Mr. Mwema holding brief for Mutua Makau for applicant Court Assistant – Mr. Munyao

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.