REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 8 2012 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 22, 23 AND 165 3(B) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 42, 62, 69 AND 73 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA 2010 AND AND IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED CONTRACTIONOF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLES 19, 20,21, 40 42, 47, 62, 66, 69, AND 73 OF THE RIGHTS TO HAVE A CLEANA ND HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT AND RIGHT TOA FAIR PARTICIPATION ON MATTERS AFFECTING PUBLIC LAND AND ENVIRONMENT AND ADMINISTRTIVE ACTION AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTIAON OF KENYA (SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION AND PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL) HIGH COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES BETWEEN ROBERT NDEGWA MURUTHI – CHAIRMAN JAMES K. KABUCHO – VICE CHAIRMAN APOLO MACIRA – SECRETARY LAIKIPIA DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE..................PETITIONER/RESPONDENT VERSUS MAYOR TOWN CLERK.....................................1ST RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
page 1 of 2
SAMUEL WAWERU – CHAIRMAN CYRUS MURIITHI – SECRETARY MAINYA TRAVELLERS SACCO.............................................2ND RESPONDENT COMMISSIONER OF LANDS................................................3RD RESPONDENT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF REPUBLI OF KENYA......4TH RESPONDENT RULING Before court is the Notice of Motion dated 7/5/2015 seeking orders as follows: “1. THAT this Honourable court be pleased to dismiss this suit for want of prosecution 2. THAT the costs of this Application be provided for” The application was set down for hearing on 16th August, 2016. All parties were properly served with Notice of the hearing date. The Petitioner failed to file any response to the application and failed to appear in court on the hearing date. MR. MAINA argued the application on behalf of the 2 nd Respondent. MR. MUKIIRA for the Interested Party and MR. WACHIRA for the Hon. Attorney General both indicated their support for the application. This Petition was first filed on 8 th March, 2012. The Petitioner took no action to prosecute the petition and it was last mentioned in court on 27th July, 2012. On 28th January 2014 an application was made to dismiss the petition. Just like in the present case the Petitioner did not respond to that application nor did they attend court on the hearing date. Hon Justice Waithaka in her ruling dated 7/11/2014 directed that the Petitioner amend their petition and have the matter listed for hearing within 60 days. Again the Petitioner sat tight and took no action to comply with these directions. It is now two years down the road. The Petitioner is still silent. It is clear they have no intention to prosecute this petition and have abandoned the same. There exists no further justification to keep the Petition alive. As such I do allow this application and I hereby strike out the petition dated 8/3/2012 for lack of prosecution. Costs to be met by the Petitioner/Respondent. It is so ordered. Dated in Nakuru this 2nd day of September, 2016. Mr. Maina holding brief for Mr. Mwangi for 2nd Respondent No appearance for Petitioner Maureen Odero Judge 2/9/2016
page 2 of 2