Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Letuiya Ltiyangoi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 20 OF 2016 REPUBLIC …………………………………….…….......…… PROSECUTOR versus LETUIYA LTIYANGOI ……………………………..………..……. ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Pena Code Cap 63. The appellant was first presented before the Nyeri High Court for trial on 10 th July 2014. On 8th May 2015 the then counsel appearing for the accused before that court applied for the accused to be released on bail pending trial. Justice Ngaah Jairus by his Ruling dated 14 th August 2015 granted the accused bail on the terms that the accused execute a bond of Kshs. 1 million with two sureties of the like sum. 2. This matter was transferred to this court for trial of the accused on 19 th July 2016. Trial commenced on 8th November 2016. The case on that date was part heard. It was fixed for further hearing to today 23rd November 2016. Learned counsel for the accused applied that accused be released on bond pending trial. It is upon my perusal of the court file on this matter that I found the accused had already been granted bail on 14th August 2015 and that being so there is no ground for this court to reconsider accused bail application. This court will proceed for hearing of this case today. 3. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016. MARY KASANGO JUDGE CORAM: Before Justice Mary Kasango Court Assistant ……………………………..……………… Accused: Letuiya Ltiyangoi ……………………………. For accused: ………………………………………………….. For the State: …................................................... COURT Ruling delivered in open court. MARY KASANGO

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.