Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Musya Mulwa

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 5 OF 2014 REPUBLIC VERSUS MUSYA MULWA RULING 1. On 16thMarch 2016 the Prosecution closed its case after calling nine (9) Prosecution witnesses. 2. The court directed that counsel for both the State and the Accused person to file their respective Written Submissions on the question of whether or not the Accused person had a case to answer. The Accused person filed his Written Submissions dared 31st March 2016 and cases in support of his case on 14th April 2016. His Further List of Authorities dated 15th April 2016 bore a date of 13th March 2016 as the date of filing. The State’s Written Submissions dated 9 th June 2016 and authorities in support of its case were filed on 9th June 2016. 3. Having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses and the Written Submissions by both the counsel for the State and the Accused person, the court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the Accused person to warrant him being put on his Defence. He is hereby put on his defence. 4. It is so ordered. DATED and DELIVERED at VOI this 21st day of June 2016 J. KAMAU JUDGE In the presence of:Sirima………………..... for State Mwinzi ………..……….for Accused person Simon Tsehlo– Court Clerk

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.