REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 83 OF 2016 (OS) IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF S N N BY A G E AND N W M (APPLICANTS) JUDGMENT 1. The Applicants A G E and N W M are in a monogamous marriage. The Applicants began to cohabit in 2012 and later solemnized the marriage under the Marriage Act 2014 at the [particulars withheld], in Nairobi on 7th February, 2015. They have three children namely: i) S N N aged 16 years ii) S M N aged 11 years biological daughters to the female Applicant. iii) J A E, aged 5 years – biological child to both Applicants. 2. They wish to adopt the child known as S N N, a minor of female sex, through the Originating Summons dated 21st June, 2016. They indicate that they are both business persons. They reside at [particulars withheld] and are both Christians. 3. The child in this matter is called S M M and was born on 30th August, 2000 to the second Applicant and the late K N N. Her father passed away on 25th December 2005. The subject child has been in continuous joint care and protection of the Applicants since 2012 when the Applicants moved in together as husband and wife. 4. The child was declared free for adoption on 4 th June 2016 by the Change Trust Adoption Society vide certificate No. […]. The Applicants signed an Explanatory Memorandum for Biological Parent/Guardian. The first Applicant swore an affidavit in the court of First Instance Holden Buea on 5 th November, 2015 confirming that the second Applicant has given her consent through an affidavit sworn on 30th October, 2015 to the 1st Applicant to undertake the adoption process both in Kenya and Cameroon. 5. The child who is now aged sixteen years also signed a consent dated 23rd October, 2015 in which she
page 1 of 3
indicated that she had no objection to the proposed adoption. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, Change Trust Adoption Society, an adoption society, prepared and filed a report in court. 6. The Adoption Society, guardian ad litem and the Director of Children’s Services have all made home visits and established that the Applicants are financially and emotionally capable of providing for the up keep and education of the child. 7. The Director of Children’s Services also filed a report dated 14 th September, 2016 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain the opportunities provided by becoming the daughter of the Applicants and growing up in a complete family setting. The guardian ad litem, Ms. H N M also filed a report that was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants. 8. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants. She was jovial and related well with the Applicants. Both Applicants’ families support the adoption. 9. More importantly, the orders sought by the Applicants relate to a child. In law, in any matter concerning a child, the best interests of a child are paramount. Article 53(2) of the Constitution provides the guiding principle on this question as follows: “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.” The principle also finds expression under the Children Act No. 8 of 2001 and in particular Section 4(3) thereof. 10. From the foregoing, this court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicants. The Applicants’ reasons for the proposed adoption were that they would like to have legal documents that would allow the children to enjoy full benefits from male Applicant, and have legal inheritance rights over their properties. This is a noble idea. The orders sought in my view will keep the already closely knit family together. 11. Reasons wherefore the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 21 st June, 2016 are allowed with the following orders: i. The Applicants, A G E and N W M are hereby allowed to jointly adopt S N M who shall henceforth be known as S N E. ii. Her date of birth is 30th August, 2000 and she is recognised as a citizen of Kenya. iii. R W M (sister to the 2nd Applicant), is hereby appointed as the legal guardian of the child, in the event that the Applicants die or are incapacitated by ill-health. iv. The Registrar General is hereby directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register. v. The Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport. vi. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered. SIGNED 2016. DATED and DELIVERED ……………………………………. L. A. ACHODE in open court this 17 th day of November,
page 2 of 3
JUDGE In the presence of ……………………Advocate for the Applicants
page 3 of 3