REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A CRIMINAL CASE NO 34 OF 2015 REPUBLIC.……………….………………..………...PROSECUTOR VERSU 1. JAMES GITHINJI MWATHA 2. ANTHONY KERICHO GACHAU………………….ACCUSED RULING 1. The Accused persons herein are charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 7/10/2015 that on 14/9/2015 at about 19.00 hours at Maragua Township in Murang’a South Sub-Country within Murang’a Country, jointly with others not before the court, they murdered one Johnson Kihato Mwatha. On 7/10/2015 they pleaded not guilty to the charge. Their trial is yet to commence. They have in the meantime applied by notice of motion dated 9/02/2016 to be admitted to bail pending trial. The Republic does not oppose the application. 2. Bail pending trial is now a constitutional right that will be denied only for compelling reason. Any condition for such bail that the court might impose, again by constitutional edict, must be reasonable. See Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. 3. I have perused the witness statements and other documents provided to the Accused persons and to court by the prosecution. I have not found in them any compelling reason to deny the Accused persons bail. Consequently I will allow the notice of motion dated 9/02/2016. The Accused persons shall each be admitted to bail upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 500,000/00 plus one surety each in like sum. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY 2016 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 29TH DAY OF JULY 2016
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.