REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE NO 14 OF 2014 REPUBLIC VERSUS SAMUEL MBOI PAUL……………………………………………………..1ST ACCUSED MWANZIA PAUL……………………………………………………………2ND ACCUSED RULING 1. On 10thFebruary 2016 the Prosecution closed its case after calling a total of seven (7) Prosecution witnesses. 2. On the same date, the court directed that counsel for the State and counsel for the Accused person to file their respective Written Submissions on the question of whether or not the Accused person had a case to answer. The matter was mentioned on 10 th March 2016 to confirm compliance but none of the counsel had filed the same. The delay in filing the said submissions was occasioned by a change of advocates for the Accused persons. 3. The State finally filed and served its Written Submissions dated 4 th July 2016 and the cases in support of its case on the same date. M/S Mulwa, Isika& Mutia Advocates who were subsequently appointed to represent the Accused persons filed their Written Submissions dated 11th July 2016 on 12th July 2016. 4. Accordingly, having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses and the Written Submissions by counsel for the State and thecounsel for the Accused person, the court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the Accused persons to warrant them being put on their Defence. They are hereby put on their defence. 5. It is so ordered. DATED and DELIVERED at VOI this 25th day of July 2016 J. KAMAU JUDGE In the presence of:Miss Mukangu…………………. for State Mrs Isika………………..……….for Accused person Simon Tsehlo– Court Clerk
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.