Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Kaviti v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2016 JOSEPH KAVITI ..............................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ..............................................................................RESPONDENT RULING By an undated Notice of Motion application filed on 21st March, 2016, the applicant, Joseph Kaviti, has applied for leave to file an application seeking to have is case, Shanzu Principal magistrate’s Criminal Case No 507 of 2013, Republic versus Joseph Kaviti, transferred from Shanzu laws courts to Mombasa law courts. According to Mr Ayodo, learned state counsel, Shanzu law court has two magistrates and all the applicant should do is to seek to have the trial magistrate in this case recuse herself from hearing his case and only she declines, then he can proceed to this court for redress by way of appeal or revision. To this, the applicant indicated he had no problem with court No1 at Shanzu law court. In consideration, and having listened to both learned counsel for the state and applicant/accused, I have also perused the record from the lower court file, application and supporting affidavit. I agree with the learned counsel for the state that the applicant ought to have made his application before the trial magistrate indicating the reasons he wants to have the case transferred from her court for consideration by herself. He can only approach this court if the trial magistrate declines to recuse herself from hearing his case and he feels aggrieved by that decision. This is so as to discourage situations where parties would be forum shopping. I therefore strike out the applicant’s undated Notice of Motion application and direct that the applicant makes his application to have the case transferred from the current trial court to another or for the trial magistrate to recuse herself from hearing the case before the said magistrate. It therefore follows that the Shanzu Principal Magistrate Criminal case No 507 of 2013, Republic Vs Joseph Kaviti be returned and placed before the trial magistrate for further orders. Ruling signed, dated and delivered this 3rd day of October, 2016.

page 1 of 2

D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: Mr Ayodo for the state Applicant in person C/clerk- Kiarie

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Joseph Kaviti v Republic — Original judgment | Caselaw