Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republc of Kenya v Timothy Marete & 1 other

REPUBLC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU E&L NO. 176 OF 2013 JAPHET BUNDI..............................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS TIMOTHY MARETE...................................................DEFENDANT RULING 1. On 6th December, 2016 the parties proffered a Consent which they asked the Court to adopt as its order. 2. The consent is dated 6th December, 2017. It is in the following terms. “By Consent Mr. Gichunge Advocate for the Plaintiff and Mr. Kiongo for the District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Ruiri/ Rwarera adjudication Section Mr. Korir agree that; 1. Parties to this suit and their advocate and DLASO shall visit the suitland on 14-02-2017 at 2:00 pm. 2. The DLASO Ruiri /Rwarera to make a report on the visit and file it in Court. 3. Mr. Kiongo to ensure security is provided by the OCS Tutwa Police Station on the date for the scene visit. 3. The Consent is adopted as an order of this Court. 4. Directions on 28/02/2017. 5. Costs shall be in the cause. 6. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF: - C:A Daniel/James Gichunge for the Plaintiff

page 1 of 2

Otieno C. for the Defendant Mr. Korir -DLASO Kiongo for AG P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.