Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Magana Gikunda v Joseph Kathunkumi Ncebere & 3 Others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE NO. 224 OF 2016 STEPHEN MAGANA GIKUNDA.................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOSEPH KATHUNKUMI NCEBERE & 3 OTHERS...........DEFENDANTS RULING 1. This application is dated 8th November, 2016 and seeks orders that:1. This Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order compelling the District Surveyor Meru County and the District Registrar Meru County to Re-measure and fix boundaries of Land Parcel No. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/2385 eradicated or/and removed by the respondents/defendants. 2. The OCS Meru Police Station further be compelled to implement the order for fixing boundaries by supervising to maintain rule of law and order in any event. 3. This Hon. Court be pleased to issue an order restraining permanently respondents from eradicating surveyors beacons/poles 2. The application has the following grounds:a) The respondents/defendants eradicated surveyors Beacons/poles fixed on Land Parcel No. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/2385 by force belonging to the applicant/plaintiff. b) The respondents/defendants share (sic) conspired to consolidate the applicant/plaintiff land parcel NO. NYAKI/MULATHANKARI/2385 by eradicating or removing surveyor's Beacons/ and poles. c) The action taken by respondent/defendants is motivated by malice and contempt of public interest and conspiracy to influence fraud of Applicant/Plaintiff land afore -said illegally. 3. During Interpartes hearing on 13/12/2016, it transpired that the application was not opposed. The Defendants merely asked for time to file grounds of opposition. 4. In the circumstances it is ordered as follows:(1) The District Surveyor, Meru County and the District Registrar Meru County are ordered to re-measure and fix boundaries of land parcel No. NYAKI/MULANTHAKARI/2385 allegedly removed by the respondents/defendants.

page 1 of 2

(2) The O.C.S Meru Police Station is ordered to assist in the implementation of order1 above so that law and order are maintained. (3) Costs to facilitate the implementation of orders 1 and 2 above are to be met by the Plaintiff/Applicant who is also required to liaise with the concerned Government officers. (4) Costs to eventually be in the cause. 5. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:CA: Daniel /James Ashava h/b Ondari for Respondents Stephen Magana -Applicant P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.