REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL SUIT NO. 9 OF 1987 ERASTUS MBAABU & ANOTHER................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS M'MBURUGU M'RINKANYA & 9 OTHERS................................DEFENDANTS RULING 1. Mr. Gatari Ringera informed the Court that in a Ruling delivered on 16th day of March, 2016 the Court referred to the Suit land as TIGANIA/TEA/SCHEME/38 when it should have read TIGANIA/TEA/SCHEME THANANGA/38. 2. MR. Gatari Ringera owned up that the apposite application had an inadvertent error in that one word, THANANGA, was left out. 3. Mr. Ringera asked the Court to issue an order for rectification so that title of the suit land reads TIGANIA/TEA SCHEME THANANGA/38. 4. I find that the oral application prosecuted by Mr. Ringera is merited. 5. The oral application is allowed. 6. It is ordered as follows:1. The caution registered against land parcel NO.TIGANIA/TEA SCHEME THANANGA/38 at the instance of the 1st Plaintiff be removed forthwith. 2. No costs concerning this oral application are awarded. 7. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU ON 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF:C.A : Daniel /James Gatari Ringera for the 3rd Defendant. P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Erastus Mbaabu & Another v M'mburugu M'rinkanya & 9 Others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.