Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Gabriel K. Ndaikwa

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE NO 4 OF 2014 REPUBLIC VERSUS GABRIEL K. NDAIKWA RULING 1. On 15th November 2016, the Prosecution closed its case after calling a total of eight (8) Prosecution witnesses. 2. On the same date, both the counsel for the State and counsel for the Accused person asked the court to rely on the evidence that was adduced during trial in deciding the question of whether or not the Accused person had a case to answer as they did not wish to file any Written Submissions. 3. Accordingly, having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses, the court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the Accused person to warrant him being put on his Defence. He is hereby put on his defence. 4. It is so ordered. DATED and DELIVERED at VOI this 15th day of December 2016 J. KAMAU JUDGE In the presence of:Miss Anyumba……………….. for State Were……….…………..……….for Accused person Josephat Mavu– Court Clerk

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.