Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7916 of 2015

REPUBIC OF KENYA IN THE HGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU PETITION NO. 31 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF CHAPTER FOUR OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND IN THE MATTER OF CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ( PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES AND IN THE M ATTER OF INFRINGEMENT OF THE PETITIONERS RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLES 27, 33, 35, 40, 47, 48, 50 AND 56 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND IN THE MATTER OF AMUN'GENTI “D” ADJUDICATION SECTION AND IN THE MATTER OF UNFAIR APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 5 AND 6 OF THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT (CAP 284 L.O.K) BETWEEN PETER KIRIMI MBOGO ….............................................................1ST PETITIONER HENRY M'MBURUGU MWAMBIA...............................................2ND PETITIONER SOLOMON MUNYUA.....................................................................3RD PETITIONER JACOB KITHERA.............................................................................4TH PETITIONER JOSEPH MITHIKA............................................................................5TH PETITIONER JEREMIAH KIBURI..........................................................................6TH PETITIONER

page 1 of 3

ISAACK GITONGA...........................................................................7TH PETITIONER PATRICK MUTHOMI........................................................................8TH PETITIONER DOREEN KIGETU.............................................................................9TH PETITIONER AND THE DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION OFFICER IGEMBE SOUTH...............................................................................1ST RESPONDENT THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER IGEMBE SOUTH...2ND RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL..........................................................3RD RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT This petition is dated 25th day of September 2014 and the petitioners pray for the following reliefs: a) An order of Judicial Review cancelling and quashing the decision and/or list of appointed committee members by the 1st and 2nd respondent to handpick committee members on 4.9.2014 contrary to the law. b) An order of permanent injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd respondents from swearing the purportedly appointed committee members of AMUNG'ENTI “D” Adjudication Section. c) A declaration that the petitioner's constitutional rights were infringed Articles. under the cited d) An order for the 1st and 2nd respondent to reconvene an election which is representative and in consonance with the law the constitution for MUNG'ENTI “D” Adjudication Section. (sic) c) Costs of the petition. On 2.11.2015 the advocates representing the parties proffered a consent which they asked the court to adopt as its order. The consent is dated 2.11.2015 and is in the following terms: “By consent, the Advocates for the petitioners and the Respondent have agreed that: 1. The respondents to disband/dissolve the Land Committee for the Amungenti Adjudication Section and a new Committee to be appointed in consultation between the petitioners and the respondents. 2. The Petitioner to withdraw the petition to allow formation of a new committee for the Amung'enti “D” Adjudication section with no orders as to costs.” The consent is adopted as an order of this court. As per the consent, I issue no order as to costs. For the avoidance of any doubt, this petition is marked as settled and definitively determined. It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 2nd day of November, 2015 in the presence of:

page 2 of 3

Cc Lilian/Daniel Ken Muriuki for the Petitioners Kiongo for the Respondents P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.