Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

D.s.p v M.h.a

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS FAMILY DIVISION DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 12 OF 2015 D.S.P................................................PETITIONER VERSUS M.H.A.............................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner D.S.P. is a Kenyan national and the respondent M.H.A. is a British national. They met in Sydney in Australia and began to stay together. On 20th April 2013 they got married. The marriage was solemnized at the West Pennant Hills Community Hall, West Pennant Hills, NSW. The couple tried to stay together but that could not work. They are both Hindu. According to their custom they were supposed to come to Kenya for a customary marriage. Further, the custom forbade them from consummating the marriage until this customary marriage had been done. The respondent refused to come to Kenya and, instead, and without informing the petitioner, went to UK. She ceased to communicate with him and began to have an affair with another man. The petitioner eventually returned to Kenya. He seeks the nullification of the marriage on the basis that the same was not consummated. The petition was filed on 16th January 2015. 2. This petition was served but this did not elicit any response. The petitioner’s evidence was therefore not controverted. I accept the evidence. 3. I declare that the marriage celebrated on 20 th April 2013 between the petitioner and the respondent was a nullity. The petitioner was not interested in the costs of the petition. The same will not therefore be granted. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 24th September 2015 A.O. MUCHELULE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.