Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daniel Wagacha Gichura & 2 others v Wilson Xavier Bwonkonyo & 6 others

No.59/2015 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS ELC CASE NO.168 OF 2011 DANIEL WAGACHA GICHURA ……....…………………….. 1ST APPLICANT EVANS THIGA GITAU ……………...…………………….…. 2ND APPLICANT JOHNSON KURIA MWANGI …………...…………………... 3RD APPLICANT VERSUS WILSON XAVIER BWONKONYO …..………………….. 1ST RESPONDENT DORCAS MBULWA MBITHI …..…………..………….…. 2ND RESPONDENT NAOMI MITA MUIA …..……………..………………….… 3RD RESPONDENT COSMOAS NJOROGE MURIITHI ….....……………….… 4TH RESPONDENT CYRUS GACHANJA MACHARIA ….....………………….. 5TH RESPONDENT BENJAMIN KIRUGU MWANGI ........…………………...…6TH RESPONDENT MARTIN NJENGA KINYANJUI …..…...…………………..7TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Claimant herein commenced instant suit via an Originating Summons (OS) dated 19.7.2011 on the 20.7.2011. The OS sought the following reliefs:1. That a declaration do issue that the District Land Registrar report and order of 20 th April, 2011 be adopted as a judgment. 2. That the Respondents, their agents and/or servants be restrained from interfering, trespassing and or encroaching on the suit property known as the Title Number Donyo Sabuk/Komarock Block 1/319. 3. That this honourable court do issue any further or such other order as it may deem just and

page 1 of 2

expedient to meet the end of justice. 4. That the cost be provided. On the face of the OS are the following grounds to support it namely; a. That the Petitioner/Applicant are the registered owner of the parcel of land known as tittle number Donyo Sabuk/Komarock Block 1/319 situated in Mavoko Machakos County which parcel was purchased and transferred in favour of the Petitioners/Applicants who hold the same as trustees of Synod Diocesan. b. That the Petitioners/Applicants did commission a surveyor to demarcate the said Donyo Sabuk Komarock Block 1/319 for purposes of sub-division and upon completing the exercise the surveyor noted that part of the parcel of land had been encroached upon by the 1 st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th Respondents. c. That the Petitioners lodged a complaint with District Land Registrar to ascertain the actual boundary of the parcel of land they had purchased and a meeting was held in light of the complainant and the District Surveyor undertook the demarcation exercise and a conclusion was arrived at an order issued determining the actual position of the boundary. d. That the order of the District Land Surveyor is yet to be enforced. 2. The OS was further supported by the Affidavit of Daniel Wagacha Gichura sworn on 19.7.2011 and 5 annextures attached. The OS was served upon the Respondents but non of them filed replying affidavit. The second Respondent/Defendant filed a notice of appointment via the firm of M. Mutinda & Associates Advocates dated 4.11.2013 on 17.1.2014 but never filed any reply to oppose the OS. 3. On 4th December, 2014 the mater proceeded by way of the affidavit as non of the Respondents and/or advocates attended despite service. The Applicant case is that they are the registered owners of suit property. That they did commission surveyors to demarcate the suit land for purposes of sub-division and upon the task being undertaken of demarcation it was established that the 1st to 7th Respondents had encroached the suit land owned by the Applicants. 4. The above finding prompted the Applicants to petition the District Land Registrar to ascertain the actual boundary of the suit land. The District Land Registrar undertook the task and made a report and ordered the position of the boundary to be as he marked on the ground and attached a sketch to indicate the correct situation of the boundary of the suit land on the ground. The Applicants seek the court to adopt the said order of the District Land Registrar as the judgment of the court. 5. The Defendants/Respondents have not opposed the OS in the instant suit which court takes to be an admission of the claim in the instant matter. The court thus makes the following orders: 1. The District Surveyor Machakos order in report dated 20.4.2011 be and is hereby adopted as the judgment of the court. 2. The Respondents are restrained from interfering and or encroaching on Donyo Sabuk/Komarock Block 1/319 as established on the ground by the District Surveyor Machakos vide report dated 20.4.2011. 3. Parties bear their own costs. Signed and Delivered at Machakos this 23rd January, 2015. CHARLES KARIUKI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.