Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mwangolo Neema v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2014 MWANGOLO NEEMA .......................................................….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ……….…….......................................................…RESPONDENT (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 389 of 2014 of the Principal Magistrate's Court at Mariakani – Hon. Shiundu – Ag. SPM) JUDGMENT The Appellant herein was Convicted and Sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment for the offence of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual offences Act No. 3 of 2006. The particulars are that:“On diverse dates between December, 2013 and March, 2014 in [Particulars withheld] village Kinango – Kwale County he willfully and unlawfully caused his penis to penetrate the vagina of N M A child aged seventeen (17) years”. Upon being arraigned in Court on the 21st day of May, 2014 the Accused pleaded guilty, facts were read to him and he stated that they were correct and he was subsequently Convicted and Sentenced to serve (15) years imprisonment. A perusal of the facts presented before the learned trial magistrate by the prosecutor show that the Complainant was aged seventeen (17) years at the time of the alleged defilement. The incident was reported to police after medical tests indicated that the Complainant was pregnant. In his mitigation the Accused had told the Court that he was aged twenty (20) years. Section 8(5) of the Sexual offences Act affords an Accused person a defence if, “(a) It is proved that such a child deceived the Accused person into believing that he or she was over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time of the alleged commission of the offence and; (b) The Accused reasonably believed that the child was over the age of eighteen (18) years”.

page 1 of 2

The Accused was not afforded the opportunity to raise such a defence and this was prejudicial to his case. To that extend, the plea was not equivocal. It is noted that the Appellant was Convicted on 21st day of May, 2014. A retrial will not be prejudicial to his case. It is accordingly ordered that the Conviction and Sentence are hereby reversed and a retrial to be held/conducted by a Court of competent jurisdiction. Mention before the Magistrate In charge Mariakani Court on 5th March, 2015 for taking of plea and further directions. Judgment delivered dated and signed this 25th day of February, 2015. …................... M. MUYA JUDGE 25TH FEBRUARY, 2015 In the presence of:Miss Ogweno for the State The Appellants in person Court clerk Musundi

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.