Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Alex Kiio Makau v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2014 ALEX KIIO MAKAU ………………………………….…… APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application dated 25/5/2014 seeks orders, inter-alia, that this case be transferred from Kithimani Law Courts. 2. The Applicant, Alex Kiio Makau was charged with the offence of house breaking contrary to section 304 (1) (b) and stealing contrary to section 279 (b) of the Penal Code. The particulars being that “on the 31 st day of December 2012 at about 11.00 hrs at Matuu Township in Yatta District within Machakos County, broke and entered into a dwelling house of Damaris Leah, Nyambura with intent to steal and did steal therein three academic certificates, 1 Panasonic radio, L.T DVD machine, cooking fats, two inner top weaving valued at Kshs.34,180/=the property of the said Damaris Leah Nyambura.” 3. The background facts according to the affidavit in support is that the complainant who is a wife to the Applicant made an application to have the case withdrawn from court and settled at home but the application was rejected by the court. The Applicant accuses the trial magistrate of being biased, hence this application. 4. The application was conceded to by the State. Consequently, for justice to be not only done but be seen to be done, I allow the application. The case is hereby transferred to Tawa Law Courts. Case to be heard de novo. Mention on 19/3/15 at the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Tawa. B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE Dated and delivered at Machakos this 18th day of February 2015. ……………………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.