Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Alwochi Ubala v Tom William Onguka

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 851 OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ALWOCH OBARA ALIAS ALWOCHI UBALA........................................DECEASED AND ABISALOM KAYERE MSIGO....................PETITIONER VERSUS TOM WILLIAM ONGUKA...........................APPLICANT RULING 1. The deceased herein ALWOCH OBARA alias OLWOCH UBALA died on 12/05/1975 while registered as the proprietor of the parcel of land known as KAKAMEGA/LUSIOLA/1096 as the only known asset. 2. Grant of his representation was issued on 02/11/2012 to the Petitioner herein ABISALOM KAYERE MISIGO in his capacity as the deceased’s son. 3. On 09/01/2013, the Applicant herein TOM WILLIAM ONGUKA filed the Summons for Revocation of the Grant dated 03/01/2013. In support thereto was the affidavit evenly sworn by the Applicant. The Applicant decries fraud on the part of the Petitioner alleging that the Petitioner is not in anyway related to the deceased and that the allegation that the Petitioner was the deceased’s son remained untrue. He called for the revocation and/or annulment of the Grant in issue. 4. I have carefully perused the entire record and it appears that the Applicant claims to be the deceased’s grandson whereas the Petitioner claims to be the deceased’s son. However, the main issue for determination in this cause as a whole would be who among the Petitioner and the Applicant will be entitled to inherit the deceased’s land aforesaid. That issue therefore calls for evidence and with a view to finally determine the dispute herein the Summons for revocation dated 03/01/2013 shall stand determined in the following manner and the Court makes the following orders: a. The Summons for Revocation or Annulment of the Grant dated 03/01/2013 be and is hereby dismissed; b. The Petitioner/Administrator shall file and serve a Summons for Confirmation of the Grant within the next 14 days and the Applicant will be at liberty to respond thereto within 14 days

page 1 of 2

of such service. c. There shall be a restriction on the parcel of land known as KAKAMEGA/LUSIOLA/1096 against any and all transactions thereto pending further orders of this Court. d. The prevailing status quo on the land known as KAKAMEGA/LUSIOLA/1096 shall be maintained pending further orders of the Court. e. The matter shall be listed for directions within 60 days of the date herein. f. Each party to bear its costs of the application. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. A. C. MRIMA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.