Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic & 1 other v Brian Kirwa Bowen

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 23 OF 2012 REPUBLIC........................................................................................PRO SECUTOR VERSUS BRIAN KIRWA BOWEN...........................................................................ACCUSED RULING 1. This case was part heard by Judge Ouko. The prosecution closed its case on the 18th October 2012. Five witnesses testified for the prosecution. 2. State Counsel Mr. Marete for the State and Ms. Mary Advocate for the accused indicated that they would file written submissions under the provisions of section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, on written the 27th November 2014, the parties abandoned filing of submissions and urged the court to consider the evidence on record and make a ruling as to whether or not the accused should be placed on his defence. 3. I have perused the proceedings on record and carefully considered the evidence tendered by the prosecution witnesses. I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused. He shall be put on his defence. Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 23rd day of January 2015

page 1 of 2

JANET MULWA JUDGE Ruling read and signed in open court in the presence of: Ngovi for State Wamasaa for Accused Court clerk – David JANET MULWA JUDGE 23/1/2015

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.