REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 5 OF 2015 MERCY CHEPKWONY................…..............................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ….............................................................RESPONDENT (Arising from Bomet Resident Magistrate's Court Criminal Case No. 119 of 2015) RULING This file was called for following my visit to the Kericho G.K. Women's Prison on 26 th March, 2015. Upon perusal of the record I note that the applicant was convicted of two offences namely; i. Being in possession of Kangara and sentenced to one(1) year imprisonment. ii. Being in possession of chang'aa and sentenced to six(6) months imprisonment. The two offences were brought under Section 27(1) (2) as read with Section 27(4) of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act. First of all there is no offence under the said Act known as being in possession of a substance used for distilling chang'aa. Further, Kangara is not an alcoholic drink under Section 2 of the Act. She should not have pleaded to count 1. I therefore quash the conviction and set aside the sentence on count 1. For count 2 – the conviction is upheld. She was sentenced to six(6) months imprisonment with no option of a fine yet she was a first offender. I find that to be too harsh. She has served two(2) months and one(1) week. I set aside the sentence and substitute it with a sentence of the period already served. She will be released forthwith unless lawfully held under a separate warrant. Dated and signed this 10th day of April, 2015 H.I. ONG'UDI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.