Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Shahto Yasaf v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO.55 OF 2015 SHAHTO YASAF……………………….…………....…………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………..…………………………..RESPONDENT RULING I have perused the lower court record. Plea was taken on 12th March, 2015. The same was unequivocal. This revision is sought on account that the fines imposed were excessive. Under Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure code, a revision shall not be sought where an appeal lies. The matters being raised herein that the applicant’s parents were killed in war were considered in the mitigation.They are not matters that may be considered in a revision. Moreso, that issue that the sentence was excessive is a matter for consideration in an appeal. In the foregoing, I decline the revision sought and dismiss the application dated 15th April, 2015. DATED and DELIVERED in NAIROBI this 14th day of April, 2015. G. W. NGENYE – MACHARIA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.