Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kabco Contractors Limited ::::::::::: Claimant v Unity Court Limited :::::::::::::::::::::: Respondent

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL & ADMIRALTY DIVISION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL SUIT NO. 322 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT NUMBER 5 OF 1995 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN KABCO CONTRACTORS LIMITED ::::::::::: CLAIMANT VERSUS UNITY COURT LIMITED :::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application before the court is a Chamber Summons dated 4th February 2015 and filed in court on 18th February 2015 under Section 36(1) of the Arbitration Act by the Claimant. The application seeks the following orders:1. That arbitral award and the supplementary award made on the 10th February 2014 and 10th June 2014 be enforced. 2. That a decree be issued in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent in terms of the said award and the supplementary award. 3. Costs of the application be met by the Respondent. 2. The application is premised on the grounds that the Respondent has failed to provide security for the enforcement of the award as ordered by this court on 16th January 2015, and that both the Arbitral Award and the supplementary award dated 10th February 2014 and 10th June 2014 remain unsettled to date. In the premises it is in the interest of justice that an order for enforcement of the award and the supplementary award be issued. 3. The application is supported by affidavit of James Njeru Kathenya sworn on 18th February 2015. Mr. Kathenya describes himself as the Managing Director of the Claimant Company. He deponed that the Respondent has failed to settle the two awards despite being notified of the same and being required to pay the same. 4. The application is not opposed. When the same came for hearing on 24th April 2015 an advocate called Kuria held brief for Mr. Githinji and applied for adjournment which was not allowed. Mr. Kuria was not ready to proceed with the hearing of the application since he said his instructions were limited to applying for adjournment. 5. I have carefully considered the application. I have noted the award made on 10th February 2014 and a supplementary award made on 10th June 2014. On 16th January 2015 this court ordered

page 1 of 2

the Respondents to provide security for the enforcement of the awards within 7 days of that Ruling, but the Respondent has not done that. In that event, the application for the enforcement of the award is merited. 6. In the upshot, the Chamber Summons application dated 4th February 2015 is allowed as prayed with costs to the Claimants. Orders accordingly. READ, DELIVERED AND DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 29TH DAY OF MAY 2015 E. K. O. OGOLA JUDGE PRESENT: Mr. Kiriaria for the Claimants No appearance for the Respondent Teresia – Court Clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.