Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Erick Ouma Ogalo

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 109 OF 2014 BETWEEN REPUBLIC …............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND ERICK OUMA OGALO …................................................................................. ACCUSED RULING The accused, Erick Ouma Ogalo, was charged with the murder of his daughter Wendy Achieng' on 1st November, 2014 at Odongo ER Village, West Sakwa, Migori County. He pleaded not guilty and the trial commenced. The court heard two witnesses. PW1 – Dr. Rua Sammy Mwatela, testified that he performed the post mortem and he concluded that the cause of death was as the result of cerebral oedema secondary to blunt force trauma on the head. PW2, the deceased's mother MARY ANYANGO testified that the child, who was eight (8) months old, was learning to walk and she could have fallen and hit her head. She also testified that the child had been sick and had injuries before 1st November, 2014 In view of this inconclusive evidence, from the principal witnesses, Ms Owenga, learned prosecutor, applied to withdraw the case under Article 157 (8) of the Constitution. As the defence counsel, Mr. Odero, does not object, I grant leave for the prosecution to withdraw the case. In light of the evidence that I have heard from the two principal witnesses it is unlikely that any criminal charges can be sustained against the accused based on the facts. I therefore acquit him of the charge and he is now set free unless he is otherwise lawfully held. Dated, signed and delivered in Open Court at Migori this 16th day of June, 2015 D. S. MAJANJA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.