REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A SUCCESSION CASE NO 288 OF 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WATHERI NJUGUNA, DECEASED FAITH WANJIRU…………………………..…………..……APPLICANT VERSUS 1 JAMES KAMAU WATHERI 2 PATRICK KARIUKI WATHERI………........……RESPONDENTS RULING 1. On 16/12/2013 this court (Ngaah, J) confirmed the grant of letters of administration intestate issued to Faith Wanjiru on 03/12/2012 and directed that the estate of the Deceased herein comprising land parcel numbers LOC 8/GATUYA/891 and LOC 8/GATUYA/893, be shared equally among FAITH WANJIRU, JAMES KAMAU WATHERI and PATRICK KARIUKI WATHERI. 2. The Administrator Faith Wanjiru subsequently applied by summons dated 23/04/2014 seeking two main orders – (i) That the Deputy Registrar of this court be authorized to sign all necessary documents on behalf of the Respondents JAMES KAMAU WATHERI and PATRICK KARIUKI WATHERI in order to give effect to the confirmed grant. (ii) That the Land Registrar, Murang’a be authorised to dispense with production of passport size photographs and PIN certificates of the said Respondents during registration of the necessary instruments (RL 7 and RL 8) to give effect to the confirmed grant herein. 3. The Respondents were served with the application and hearing notice. They neither filed replying affidavit nor attended hearing of the application. 4. I have read the affidavit sworn in support of the application. I am satisfied that the Respondents have failed to sign the necessary instruments or produce the necessary documents in order to give effect to the confirmed grant herein, without offering any reason for such failure. 5. In the circumstances I will allow the application as prayed with no order as to costs. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.