REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA CIVIL SUIT NO. 113 OF 2011 CHARLES WEPUKHULU……………..….................................... APPELLANT VERSUS BUNGOMA TEACHERS SAVINGS & CREDIT SOCIETY........RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application before court is dated 1st April, 2015 brought pursuant to Section 3, 3A and 63 (e) of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rules 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application seeks for the proceedings, ruling and Court Order of 10th March 2015 be reviewed and set aside and costs provided, the reason that there is an apparent error on the face of the record as the said ruling related to a matter that had already been dealt with. 2. The application was not opposed and at the hearing Mr. Kassim for the applicant contended that the application dated 6th March, 2012 had been dealt with and a ruling made and that what was pending was a preliminary objection dated 24th November 2011. 3. I have considered the application before court and it is clear that this is an error as the application of 16th March, 2012 was dealt with and a ruling delivered on the 9th of December, 2014. What needs to be considered is the preliminary objection now pending. For the above reasons the ruling of 10th March, 2015 is therefore set aside. Costs in the cause. Dated at Bungoma this 10th day of JUNE 2015. ALI-ARONI JUDGE.
Original judgment
Charles Wepukhulu v Bungoma Teachers Savings & Credit Society
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.