Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Julius Kiambati M'mbura v Bernard Kirimi Thirungua & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2015 JULIUS KIAMBATI M'MBURA....................APPLICANT/INTENDED APPELLANT VERSUS BERNARD KIRIMI THIRUNGUA...........................................1ST RESPONDENT THE LAND & SETTLEMENT OFFICER, TIGANIA WEST DISTRICT …............................2ND RESPONDENT RULING This application is dated 16.9.2015 and seeks orders: 1. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to certify this matter as urgent and hear the same experte in the 1st instance. 2. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to stay the proceedings in TIGANIA P.MCC NO. 197 of 2014 pending the hearing interpartes of this application or further orders of the court. 3. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to stay the proceedings in TIGANIA PMCC NO. 197 of 2014 pending the hearing and determination of the main application herein and the intended appeal. 4. THAT costs be in the cause. The application is supported by the affidavit of JULIUS KIAMBATI M'MBURA and has the following grounds: 1. THAT the case in Tigania being PMCC NO. 197 of 2014 has been fixed for hearing on 06.10.2015. 2. THAT the hearing of the suit in Tigania Law Courts shall greatly prejudice the application herein as the applicant seeks to be heard in the case. 3. THAT it is in the interests of justice that this application is filed. In the interest of Justice, I grant prayer 2. The application will be heard on 12.10.2015.

page 1 of 2

Costs shall be in the cause It is so ordered. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 22nd day of September 2015 in the presence of: Cc. Daniel/Lilian Mwanzia for the Applicant P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.