REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU REVISION NO. 49 OF 2015 Z N.....................................................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...................................................................................................RESPONDENT REVISION ORDER The accused, ZN, is a 14 year old school girl who was arraigned before Nakuru Magistrate’s Court on 29/4/2015 facing a charge of selling unprescribed alcoholic drinks contrary to Section 32 of the Alcoholic Drinks Act and a second charge of selling alcoholic drinks without a licence contrary to Section 2 of the same Act. The minor pleaded guilty to both charges. She was convicted and sentenced on the 1st count to a fine of Kshs.20,000/- in default three (3) months imprisonment and on the 2 nd count she was fined Kshs.5,000/- in default two (2) months imprisonment. The accused was unable to raise the fine and is currently serving her sentence at the GK Prison in Nakuru. A request for review of sentence was made in this matter by the Nakuru Sub-County Probation Officer vide a letter to court dated 5/5/2015. I note that the accused only 14 years old is a minor under the law. She is a school girl and attends Highland Mission School in Form I. I have perused her annexed report which shows that she is a promising student. I take judicial notice of the fact that schools have now opened for the 2nd term thus her continued incarceration will mean that her education will be compromised. Given this set of circumstances and given that the child has already spent about a week in prison, I hereby review her sentence and reduce it to time served. The accused is to be set at liberty forthwith unless she is otherwise lawfully held. MAUREEN A. ODERO JUDGE 6/5/2015
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.